Nazi Medical Experiments Essay - 1297 Words.
This paper identifies and examines the problem that modern medicine faces when addressing the issue of medical experiments performed by the Nazis in World War Two. It explains that men of medicine are meant to heal our wounds and cure our disease all in the name of humanity and how this was the total opposite of what was done in Nazi Germany.
Study On The Nazi Medical Experiments History Essay. The Holocaust is another name for the mass genocide that killed off millions of Jews. During this appalling period, the German Nazis developed many new ways to kill people. One of these methods were using the Jews as guinea pigs and doing many different medical experiments on them.
In Dani Veracity's article Human medical experimentation in the United States: The shocking true history of modern medicine and psychiatry (1833-1965) she relates that subjecting live human beings to science experiments that are sometimes cruel, sometimes painful, sometimes deadly and always a risk-is a major part of U.S history that would not be found in most history or science books.
Medical Experiments of the Holocaust Kaitlin Holocaust in History January 6, 2013 Many brutal atrocities were committed during the Holocaust by the Nazi party against anyone they viewed as “unpure”. This included the Jews, Gypsies, homosexuals, Afro-Germans, Slavs, communists, the handicapped, and the mentally disabled.
Research experiments, such as hypothermia and pressure, began out of a need for innovation, while racially motivated experiments, such as sterilization and euthanasia, originated from anti-Semitic movements. Medical research was performed in the hope that a discovery would establish the Third Reich as a world leader.
The modern body of medical knowledge about how the human body reacts to freezing to the point of death is based almost exclusively on these Nazi experiments. This, together with the recent use of data from Nazi research into the effects of phosgene gas, has proved controversial and presents an ethical dilemma for modern physicians who do not agree with the methods used to obtain these data.(16).
In the immediate postwar period, Andrew Ivy, a physician-scientist and American Medical Association representative at the Nuremberg war-crimes trials, declared that the Nazi experiments on humans.